Yes, Again: Fracking Gets a Clean Bill of Health

Clean and green, baby

Clean and green, baby

Walter Russell Mead writes: The British government’s health agency is the latest body to give fracking a clean bill of health, in a move that should galvanize the country to act on its considerable reserves of shale gas. Reuters reports:

Public Health England (PHE) said in a review that any health impacts were likely to be minimal from hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which involves the pumping of water and chemicals into dense shale formations deep underground….

“The currently available evidence indicates that the potential risks to public health from exposure to emissions associated with the shale gas extraction process are low if operations are properly run and regulated,” said John Harrison, director of PHE’s center for radiation, chemical and environmental hazards.

Don’t expect this to sway recalcitrant greens; one activist pointed out that “low risk is not the same as no risk,” which while semantically true, doesn’t belong in an energy policy discussion. Every energy source entails risks, from wind (bird deaths, anyone?) to coal, from solar (bird blindness) to, yes, shale gas. The goal, then, shouldn’t be to eliminate risk, but rather to minimize it. This new review suggests that that’s possible with shale gas.

Energy prices are the topic du jour for British politicians right now, as parties compete over who can further distance themselves from the green policies that have been pushing electricity prices higher and higher. The UK is sitting on an estimated 1.3 quadrillion cubic feet of shale gas. Drilling can be done safely, and can boost the country’s energy security.

[Oil rig image and plant image courtesy of Shutterstock]

Via Meadia

2 Comments on “Yes, Again: Fracking Gets a Clean Bill of Health”

  1. The UK government lives in a fantasy world.
    All UK government departments tell the truth as they have been TOLD to tell it. As for galvanizing the country? It will!
    Into more protests than ever before because not everyone is a sheeple in the UK and most know if the government says something is safe, there is no way in hell that it is.

  2. The Butcher says:

    Frankly, I’m a lot more suspicious of the anti-fracking propaganda from the anti-science, anti-energy activist Left. Their agenda been dishonest from day one. Fracking has the potential to free the western world from dependence on energy from middle-eastern producers, and unleash greater employment potential and economic independence. The next leap: the little-discussed revolution in safer, more advanced, lower cost, higher-yeild micro-nuclear power plants. “Green” energy is a fraud. As secondary and minor sources of power, it has a place, but it’s primarily a money hole for vested interests. Shale oil, and nuclear energy are the best two-stage strategy for power in the 21st century.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.