Liberals are the Real Culture-War AggressorsPosted: December 3, 2013 | |
And they’re wrong to get deeply involved in the reproductive choices of Americans.
Jonah Goldberg writes: Maybe someone can explain to me how, exactly, conservatives are the aggressors in the culture war? In the conventional narrative of American politics, conservatives are obsessed with social issues. They want to impose their values on everyone else. They want the government involved in your bedroom. Those mean right-wingers want to make “health care choices” for women.
Now consider last week’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to consider two cases stemming from Obamacare: Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Sebelius and Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores. Democratic politicians and their fans on social media went ballistic almost instantly. That’s hardly unusual these days. But what’s revealing is that the talking points are all wrong.
Suddenly, the government is the hero for getting deeply involved in the reproductive choices of nearly every American, whether you want the government involved or not. The bad guy is now your boss who, according to an outraged Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., would be free to keep you from everything from HIV treatment to vaccinating your children if Hobby Lobby has its way. Murray and the White House insist that every business should be compelled by law to protect its employees’ “right” to “contraception” that is “free.”
Birth control not a right
I put all three words in quotation marks because these are deeply contentious claims. For starters, the right to free birth control — or health care generally — is not one you’ll find in the Constitution. And even if you think it should be a right, that is hardly a settled issue in American life.
The right to own a gun is a far more settled issue constitutionally, politically and legally in this country, but not even the National Rifle Association would dream to argue that we have a right to free guns, provided by our employers. If your boss were required to give you a gun, your new employer-provided Glock still wouldn’t be free because non-cash compensation is still compensation. The costs to the employer are fungible, which means whether it’s a pistol or a pill, the cost is still coming out of your paycheck — and your coworkers’ paychecks.
“Regular, predictable expenses such as birth control pills cannot be defrayed by insurance; they can only be prepaid, with a markup for the insurer’s administrative costs,” writesBloomberg’s Megan McArdle. “The extra cost is passed on by the insurers to your employer, and from your employer to you and your fellow workers, either by raising your contribution or lowering the wage they are willing to offer.”
Last, birth control pills really aren’t the issue. Both companies suing the government under Obamacare have no objection to providing insurance plans that cover the cost of birth control pills and other forms of contraception. What both the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties object to is paying for abortifacients — drugs that terminate a pregnancy rather than prevent one. (Hobby Lobby also opposes paying for IUDs, which prevent implantation of a fertilized egg.) The distinction is simple: Contraception prevents fertilization and pregnancy. Drugs such as “Plan B” terminate a pregnancy, albeit at an extremely early stage.
Leave us out of it
The plaintiffs in these cases aren’t saying the government should ban abortifacients or make it impossible for their employees to buy them. All they are asking is that the people using such drugs pay for them themselves rather than force employers and co-workers to share the cost. In other words, Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood want such birth control decisions to be left to individual women and their doctors. Leave the rest of us out of it.
But leaving the rest of us out of it is exactly the opposite intent of the authors of Obamacare. The law forces not only arts and crafts shops but also Catholic charities and other religiously inspired groups to choose between fulfilling their mission or violating their values. You may have no moral objection to such things, but millions of people do. By what right are liberals seeking to impose their values on everyone else? Isn’t that something they denounce conservatives for?
They could have allowed for plans that exclude controversial forms of birth control — or even uncontroversial ones — which would have lowered premium costs and expanded health care coverage to more poor people.
But Democrats wanted a wedge issue to drum up a new battle in the culture war — a war in which liberals have always been the aggressors.
Jonah Goldberg, fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and National Review contributing editor, is author of The Tyranny of Clichés, now out in paperback. He is also a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributors.
In addition to its own editorials, USA TODAY publishes diverse opinions from outside writers, including our Board of Contributors. To read more columns like this, go to the opinion front page or follow us on twitter @USATopinion orFacebook.
- Morgan Freeman Denies Rumor of Deal to Narrate Jonah Goldberg’s Morning Newspaper Ritual Lawn Walks: ‘It’s Not True’, He says (punditfromanotherplanet.com)
- Jonah Goldberg: Democrats, Republicans failing to live up to brands (azstarnet.com)
- If You Missed It Earlier, Do Yourself a Favor and Read Jonah Goldberg’s Delightful Piece on the Obam… (pjmedia.com)
- Hobby Lobby Case Would Thwart Obamacare’s Benefits for Casual Sex (bighealthreport.com)
- JONAH GOLDBERG: Obama In The Dark: Dems Have Only Themselves To Blame For ObamaCare Quagmire. Y… (pjmedia.com)
- Jonah Goldberg: Obama Like Chauncey Gardner Defending ‘Worst IT Disaster in American History’ (newsbusters.org)
- Jonah Goldberg Unloads On Greg Sargent, Liberal Healthcare Policy Wonks And Assorted Other Fools (minx.cc)
- Obamacare – the joy of failure by Jonah Goldberg (deadcitizensrightssociety.wordpress.com)
- Supreme Court To Take Up Controversial Birth Control Cases (huffingtonpost.com)
- Jonah Goldberg: Dem, GOP brand names fail (goerie.com)