America’s New Policy of Retreat is Leaving Our Friends Exposed

obama-woe

Charles Krauthammer writes: Three crises, one president, many bewildered friends.

The first crisis, barely noticed here, is Ukraine’s sudden turn away from Europe and back to the Russian embrace.

After years of negotiations for a major trading agreement with the European Union, Ukraine succumbed to characteristically blunt and brutal economic threats from Russia and abruptly walked away. Ukraine is instead considering joining the Moscow-centered Customs Union with Russia’s fellow dictatorships Belarus and Kazakhstan.

This is no trivial matter. Ukraine is not just the largest country in Europe, it’s the linchpin for Vladimir Putin’s dream of a renewed imperial Russia, hegemonic in its neighborhood and rolling back the quarter-century advancement of the “Europe whole and free” bequeathed by America’s victory in the Cold War.

The U.S. response? Almost imperceptible. As with Iran’s ruthlessly crushed Green Revolution of 2009, the hundreds of thousands of protesters who’ve turned out to reverse this betrayal of Ukrainian independence have found no voice in Washington. Can’t this administration even rhetorically support those seeking a democratic future, as we did during Ukraine’s Orange Revolution of 2004?

A Washington Post headline explains: “With Russia in mind, U.S. takes cautious approach on Ukraine unrest.” We must not offend Putin. We must not jeopardize Obama’s precious “reset,” a farce that has yielded nothing but the well-earned distrust of allies like Poland and the Czech Republic whom we wantonly undercut in a vain effort to appease Russia on missile defense.

The second crisis is the Middle East — the collapse of confidence of U.S. allies as America romances Iran.

The Gulf Arabs are stunned at their double abandonment. In the nuclear negotiations with Iran, the U.S. has overthrown seven years of Security Council resolutions prohibiting uranium enrichment and effectively recognized Iran as a threshold nuclear state. This follows our near-abandonment of the Syrian revolution and de facto recognition of both the Assad regime and Iran’s “Shiite Crescent” of client states stretching to the Mediterranean.

Equally dumbfounded are the Israelis, now trapped by an agreement designed less to stop the Iranian nuclear program than to prevent the Israeli Air Force from stopping the Iranian nuclear program.

Neither Arab nor Israeli can quite fathom Obama’s naïveté in imagining some strategic condominium with a regime that defines its very purpose as overthrowing American power and expelling it from the region.

Better diplomacy than war, say Obama’s apologists, an adolescent response implying that all diplomacy is the same, as if a diplomacy of capitulation is no different from a diplomacy of pressure.

What to do? Apply pressure. Congress should immediately pass punishing new sanctions to be implemented exactly six months hence — when the current interim accord is supposed to end — if the Iranians have not lived up to the agreement and refuse to negotiate a final deal that fully liquidates their nuclear-weapons program.

The third crisis is unfolding over the East China Sea, where, in open challenge to Obama’s “pivot to Asia,” China has brazenly declared a huge expansion of its airspace into waters claimed by Japan and South Korea.

Obama’s first response — sending B-52s through that airspace without acknowledging the Chinese — was quick and firm. Japan and South Korea followed suit. But when Japan then told its civilian carriers not to comply with Chinese demands for identification, Washington told U.S. air carriers to submit.

Which, of course, left the Japanese hanging. It got worse. During Vice President Biden’s visit to China, the administration buckled. Rather than insisting on a withdrawal of China’s outrageous claim, we began urging mere nonenforcement.

Again leaving our friends stunned. They need an ally, not an intermediary. Here is the U.S. again going over the heads of allies to accommodate a common adversary. We should be declaring the Chinese claim null and void, ordering our commercial airlines to join Japan in acting accordingly, and supplying them with joint military escorts if necessary.

This would not be an exercise in belligerence but a demonstration that if other countries unilaterally overturn the status quo, they will meet a firm, united, multilateral response from the West.

Led by us. From in front.

No one’s asking for a JFK-like commitment to “bear any burden” to “assure the . . . success of liberty.” Or a Reaganesque tearing down of walls. Or even a Clintonian assertion of America as the indispensable nation. America’s allies are seeking simply a reconsideration of the policy of retreat that marks this administration’s response to red-line challenges all over the world — and leaves them naked.

— Charles Krauthammer is a nationally syndicated columnist. © 2013 the Washington Post Writers Group

National Review Online


4 Comments on “America’s New Policy of Retreat is Leaving Our Friends Exposed”

  1. […] Pundit from another Planet Charles Krauthammer writes: Three crises, one president, many bewildered friends. The first crisis, […]

  2. Lets face it, someone voted him in not once but twice, and now your street cred has been well blown away.

    Problem is the US government appears to be in disarray, you’ve got bankrupt cities, mass unemployment, and you’ve all but destroyed your medical insurance industry and left your medical world laying off staff.
    Your armed forces are being decimated from the top down and your alphabet soup of government agencies have been publicly exposed for spying on everyone ESPECIALLY your oldest friends. (It don’t help that the UK is helping you dig holes either i.e. GCHQ)
    You seem to have religious, immigration, and race troubles.
    Your system of political correctness is WAY more stupid than the UK’s and ours is bad enough.
    You have a transit security system second only to the KGB or Stazi in it’s powers, and depending on what you read you’re losing your guns, freedoms, and livelihoods.
    Your police are better armed and equipped than your army and protect and serve is now sat in a battle tank.
    You make deals with the devil SPECIFICALLY to pee off the Saudi, UAE, and Israel, and stand back as Russia gains more power having embarrassed you with the Syria thingy.
    As for money? The USD may soon fall to the Yuan.
    Have I left anything out?
    ALL THIS I read from blogs and news sites.

    From outside looking in via the media (both yours and foreign) and the alternative press i.e. blogs, you aren’t exactly portraying yourself as anything less than a disaster.

    I’m not knocking the US, hell I’d love to move there BUT being a UK citizen I can’t.
    You won’t let me! I’m not illegal immigrant enough or from a terrorist nation.

  3. Brittius says:

    Reblogged this on Brittius.com and commented:
    West – Krauthammer 2016


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.