[BOOKS] Where Does the Left vs. Right Fight Come From?
Posted: February 2, 2014 Filed under: History, Reading Room, Think Tank | Tags: American Revolution, Burke, Edmund Burke, French Revolution, Great Debate, Levin, Thomas Paine, Yuval Levin 1 CommentA review of Yuval Levin’s Book The Great Debate
Jon Bishop writes: We too often assume that the left and right divide began with the eruptions of the ’60s or with the presidency of FDR. It is in fact much older — ancient, even, for it is not out of the question to assume that Greece and Rome faced similar questions. So Yuval Levin, with his The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left, has done modern American political discourse an incredible service by reminding us to always consider the historical context.
[The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left at Amazon]
Levin takes the reader on a guided tour of the Enlightenment-drenched late 18th century and demonstrates how Burke and Paine, who serve as Levin’s representatives for conservative liberalism and progressive liberalism, respectively, adapted the thinking of the age to their approach to political questions. He draws from both their letters and published works — which make for great reading, by the way. Both, after all, were wonderful rhetoricians.
Their two defining moments? The French and American Revolutions. Paine supported both, because he viewed them as serious expressions of Enlightenment liberalism — the crushing of institutions and traditions, the releasing of the individual from various constraints, the basis of all things on reason. As Levin notes, Burke, though he supported the American Revolution, was horrified by the French Revolution, viewing it as a “mortal threat to liberty” (29). He of course believed that good, free regimes were based upon habit, sentiment, and communal association — with the dead, the living, and the yet to be born.
If you are familiar with political philosophy, then neither of their positions will come as a surprise. What I think is most important about Levin’s book is this: he reminds us that the United States is not really heir to a truly conservative tradition. For instance: Burke was a conservative Whig. This is why a strong, objective sense of history is important…
Related articles
- Revolutionary Roots Of U.S. Political Divide Explored In New Yuvel Levin Book (huffingtonpost.com)
- From Pawn Stars To Bridgegate – After Over Two Centuries The Burke Paine Debate Still Echoes (forbes.com)
- Ghosts of Burke and Paine Still Haunt U.S. Politics – Bloomberg (bloomberg.com)
- Book Preview: The Great Debate (torylawyer.wordpress.com)
- Frum: Would ‘first conservative’ recognize today’s right? (cnn.com)
- The Shortlist: Yuval Levin’s ‘Great Debate,’ and More (nytimes.com)
- Jonah Goldberg: ‘Duck Dynasty,” Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine (goerie.com)
- Thomas Paine and Edmund Burke Explain the History of a Polarized Congress (usnews.com)
- PRESS Pass: Yuval Levin (presspass.nbcnews.com)
[…] Pundit from another Planet A review of Yuval Levin’s Book The Great Debate Jon Bishop writes: We too often assume that […]