Camille Paglia Talks Birds & BeesPosted: March 17, 2014 | |
Paglia Tells Educators to Get Real. When public schools refuse to acknowledge gender differences, we betray boys and girls alike
Camille Paglia writes: Fertility is the missing chapter in sex education. Sobering facts about women’s declining fertility after their 20s are being withheld from ambitious young women, who are propelled along a career track devised for men.
“Too often, sex education defines pregnancy as a pathology, for which the cure is abortion.”
The refusal by public schools’ sex-education programs to acknowledge gender differences is betraying both boys and girls. The genders should be separated for sex counseling. It is absurd to avoid the harsh reality that boys have less to lose from casual serial sex than do girls, who risk pregnancy and whose future fertility can be compromised by disease. Boys need lessons in basic ethics and moral reasoning about sex (for example, not taking advantage of intoxicated dates), while girls must learn to distinguish sexual compliance from popularity.
[Download Paglia’s book “Glittering Images: A Journey Through Art from Egypt to Star Wars” from Amazon]
Above all, girls need life-planning advice. Too often, sex education defines pregnancy as a pathology, for which the cure is abortion. Adolescent girls must think deeply about their ultimate aims and desires. If they want both children and a career, they should decide whether to have children early or late. There are pros, cons and trade-offs for each choice.
Unfortunately, sex education in the U.S. is a crazy quilt of haphazard programs. A national conversation is urgently needed for curricular standardization and public transparency. The present system is too vulnerable to political pressures from both the left and the right–and students are trapped in the middle.
Currently, 22 states and the District of Columbia mandate sex education but leave instructional decisions to school districts. Sex-ed teachers range from certified health educators to volunteers and teenage “peer educators” with minimal training. That some instructors may import their own sexually permissive biases is evident from the sporadic scandals about inappropriate use of pornographic materials or websites.
The modern campaign for sex education began in 1912 with a proposal by the National Education Association for classes in “sexual hygiene” to control sexually transmitted diseases like syphilis. During the AIDS crisis of the 1980s, Surgeon General C. Everett Koop called for sex education starting in third grade. In the 1990s, sex educators turned their focus to teenage pregnancy in inner-city communities.
Sex education has triggered recurrent controversy, partly because it is seen by religious conservatives as an instrument of secular cultural imperialism, undermining moral values. It’s time for liberals to admit that there is some truth to this and that public schools should not promulgate any ideology. The liberal response to conservatives’ demand for abstinence-only sex education has been to condemn the imposition of “fear and shame” on young people. But perhaps a bit more self-preserving fear and shame might be helpful in today’s hedonistic, media-saturated environment…Read the rest….
Paglia is the author of Glittering Images: A Journey Through Art from Egypt to Star Wars”
- CAMILLE PAGLIA: Put The Sex Back In Sex Ed. Fertility is the missing chapter in sex education. S… (pjmedia.com)
- When A Lesbian, Atheist Feminist Is Actually Correct About Sex Ed (mikesright.wordpress.com)
- ‘Put the Sex Back in Sex Ed’ says Camille Paglia (pjmedia.com)
- Camille Paglia Is a Real Housewives Superfan (nymag.com)
- Nathan Harden : Marry Smart or Maybe Not at All (ricochet.com)
- Camille Paglia and Her Problems (deadcitizensrightssociety.wordpress.com)
- Two Takes From Camille Paglia: A Feminist Defense of Masculine Virtues and Duck Dynasty (bostongazette.wordpress.com)
- Camille Paglia: ‘What You’re Seeing is How a Civilization Commits Suicide…’ (pjmedia.com)