REWIND: Hillary’s Benghazi LiePosted: May 3, 2014
Remembering the injustice done to the grieving father of an American hero.
For National Review Online, Mona Charen writes: The Ben Rhodes memo revealing the duplicity of this administration on the subject of Benghazi reminds us about the character of those involved. That President Obama could lie so evenly and so passionately (remember the second presidential debate?) is perhaps not surprising at this stage. But let’s not forget what it took for Mrs. Clinton to lie to the grieving father of an American hero.
First, a refresher on the facts (as they were certainly known to the principals):
A convoy of well-armed terrorists rolled into the complex housing the American consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. The attackers sealed off streets leading to the consulate with trucks and then commenced the attack on the building using rocket-propelled grenades, AK-47s, mortars, and artillery mounted on trucks. Ambassador Chris Stevens called Deputy Chief of Mission Gregory Hicks for help, saying “Greg, we’re under attack.” Hicks, who was in Tripoli, conveyed this up the line, but no help arrived.
The terrorists killed Ambassador Stevens and another American and set the building ablaze. (Two more Americans would die later attempting to protect the annex.) As soon as the next morning, Congressman Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, described the attack as a “commando-style event” with “coordinated fire, direct fire, [and] indirect fire.” A few days later the Libyan president said that it was a planned terrorist attack. He also said that the idea that it was a “spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous.” Yet a well-orchestrated disinformation campaign by the Obama administration managed to put the press off the story and mislead the American people.
The brazenness and scope of the disinformation would make any KGB colonel sigh with admiration. At 10:32 on the night of the attack, Secretary Clinton issued a statement deploring violence in response to “inflammatory material posted on the Internet.” In the days that followed, the president and his spokesman repeatedly invoked the supposedly offensive video as the cause of the attack. The president and secretary of state even filmed commercials to play in Muslim countries denouncing the video while also upholding America’s tradition of religious and political freedom. “We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others,” said the president. “But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence.”
But as the State Department finally disclosed a month after the attack (and as had been widely reported before then), there was no protest outside the American consulate in Benghazi. Nothing. Not a peep…(read more)
— Mona Charen is a nationally syndicated columnist. © 2014 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
- The Benghazi Web of Deception (usdailyreview.com)
- US House to open new Benghazi inquiry (bbc.co.uk)
- Jay Carney: New Benghazi Emails Were Not About Benghazi (ironicsurrealism.com)
- Boehner To Appoint Select Benghazi Committee (npr.org)
- VIDEO Montage: Just a Few Times that Obama, Clinton, Carney, et al Blamed Benghazi on a Video (pjmedia.com)
- Email: State Dept Official Close to Hillary Informed Benghazi Was Terrorist Attack (mediaite.com)
- Boehner calls for House select committee to investigate Benghazi attacks (nydailynews.com)
- Editorial: Talking points, part II; Benghazi (bostonherald.com)
- BOMBSHELL! Newly Decl;assified Email Points Directly To Obama White House Prepping Susan Rice On Deliberately Misleading Benghazi Talking Points (ironicsurrealism.com)
- Top official thought kidnapping Stevens was Benghazi aim (wnd.com)