Sanctions? What Sanctions? Paris Arms Putin
Posted: May 14, 2014 Filed under: Diplomacy, Russia, War Room | Tags: Crimea, France, John Fund, Mistral, Mistral-class amphibious assault ship, RUSSIA, Strategic Studies Institute, Vladimir Putin 2 CommentsFor NRO, John Fund writes: France has decided to ignore pleas from the U.S. and its other NATO allies and go forward with a $1.7 billion contract to sell two helicopter carriers to Vladimir Putin’s Russia. “The contract has been paid and there would be financial penalties for not delivering it,” a French official told Reuters on Monday. “It would be France that is penalized. It’s too easy to say France has to give up on the sale of the ships. We have done our part.”
The French decision makes a mockery of the attempt to impose sanctions on Russia for its illegal annexation of Crimea in March, the first forcible shifting of borders in Europe in more than 60 years.
It’s not hard to figure out why the Russians want the carriers. They purchased them just after invading Georgia in 2008. Russia’s lack of a mobile platform for delivering troops had hurt it badly during that brief conflict. In a 2011 report on the invasion, the Strategic Studies Institute, an arm of the U.S. Army War College, found that Russia had used helicopters to insert Spetsnaz commandos in black uniforms behind Georgian lines to conduct subversion and espionage. Putin used the same tactics in Crimea this month. But Russia’s experience in Georgia, in which aircraft had landed on the coast, had “highlighted the need for improvements in the area of amphibious landing platforms,” the SSI report noted. “The limitations in this capability exposed by the war were certainly part of the reason for Russia’s recent decision to buy Mistral-class ships from France. The Mistral, a multi-role ship capable of transporting and deploying 16 helicopters, 70 armored vehicles, and up to 450 personnel represents a significant improvement over current Russian helicopter carriers and landing craft.”
A Russian admiral later said he could have won the war in “40 minutes instead of 26 hours” if he had had them earlier…(read more)
— John Fund is national-affairs columnist at National Review Online.
Related articles
- France to Go Ahead With $1.66 Billion Sale of Helicopter Carriers to Russia (matthewaid.com)
- US says French warships to Russia ‘unhelpful’ (euobserver.com)
- France refuses to block Mistral warship deal with Russia (veteranstoday.com)
- France: Allies must make sacrifices over Russian sanctions (worldbulletin.net)
- Former Russian PM Tells Washington to Hit Putin with Sanctions Where It Hurts (pjmedia.com)
- So how are those international sanctions against Russia going? (hotair.com)
- National Journal: Hillary resets on Russia (hotair.com)
- PUTIN PUSHES RESET BUTTON – Halts All Talks with Obama White House (thegatewaypundit.com)
- Lining Putin’s Pockets: Senators Want Obama to Call Off Contracts with Russian Arms Giant (pjmedia.com)
- Romney: I hate to say I told you so, but … (hotair.com)

Reblogged this on Brittius.com.
I don’t get it. It’s business, surely that’s the US way, money rules.
After all they sell or give arms to terrorists and other sundry low lives and call it “support”.
There again would this fuss be created if the US had been selling the ships?
Somehow I think not.