BREAKING: Victory in Palmer v. D.C. ‘The Court finds that the District of Columbia’s complete ban on the carrying of handguns in public is unconstitutional’
Posted: July 26, 2014 Filed under: Breaking News, Law & Justice | Tags: Court, District of Columbia, District of Columbia v. Heller, Handgun, Illinois, Moore, Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, Washington DC 4 CommentsJust in: For Reality-Based Litigation, alangura writes,
Justice never sleeps…. not even on a Saturday afternoon, when this opinion was just handed down.
In light of Heller, McDonald, and their progeny, there is no longer any basis on which this Court can conclude that the District of Columbia’s total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional under any level of scrutiny. Therefore, the Court finds that the District of Columbia’s complete ban on the carrying of handguns in public is unconstitutional. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and enjoins Defendants from enforcing the home limitations of D.C. Code § 7-2502.02(a)(4) and enforcing D.C. Code § 22-4504(a) unless and until such time as the District of Columbia adopts a licensing mechanism consistent with constitutional standards enabling people to exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms.4 Furthermore, this injunction prohibits the District from completely banning the carrying of handguns in public for self-defense by otherwise qualified non-residents based solely on the fact that they are not residents of the District.
In 2012, I won Moore v. Madigan, 702 F.3d 933 (7th Cir. 2012), which struck down Illinois total ban on the carrying of defensive handguns outside the home…(read more)
Related articles
- Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Major Second Amendment Case (reason.com)
- Illinois Supreme Court: Second Amendment Protects Carrying Outside the Home (volokh.com)
- Justice Delnied: Gura Files Renewed Petition for Mandamus in Palmer “Right to Bear” case (gunwatch.blogspot.com)
- House GOP to D.C. residents: Guns OK, marijuana dangerous (wjla.com)
- NRA President James Porter on the job of police: No duty to protect (dailycaller.com)
- Civil Rights Update: Illinois Supreme Court Rules Second Amendment Protects Carrying Outside the Home (punditfromanotherplanet.com)
- Appellate court affirms unconstitutionality of California ammunition controls (dailycaller.com)
- Chicago: Unable to Ban Gun Dealers, Emanuel Seeks To Regulate Them Out Of Existence (dailycaller.com)
- Feinstein’s New Gun-Ban Bill Likely to be Introduced January 22 (dailycaller.com)
- Cleta Mitchell to the IRS: Answer this (powerlineblog.com)
[…] By Pundit from another Planet Just in: For Reality-Based Litigation, alangura writes, Justice never sleeps…. not even on a Saturday afternoon, when this opinion was just handed down. In light of Heller, McDonald, and their progeny, there is no longer any basis on which this Court can conclude that the District of Columbia’s total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is […] Like this? Read more and get your own subscription at […]
Reblogged this on Dead Citizen's Rights Society.
Couldn’t resist the photo. The S&W Lady Smith is one of “my favorite things.”
You have good taste. I prefer that subtle engraving, to a ridiculous pink grip (which turns off more potential female gun buyers than it inspires) a dreadful trend aiming to capitalize on a new breed of consumers.
S&W makes good compact handguns. A revolver with that kind of style and portability is appealing to males, too.