Stephen F. Hayes: Why Haven’t We Seen the Documents Retrieved in the Bin Laden Raid?Posted: September 6, 2014 Filed under: Think Tank, War Room, White House | Tags: al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Central Intelligence Agency, CIA, Death of Osama bin Laden, Defense Intelligence Agency, Laden, Osama bin Laden, Stephen F. Hayes, United States, Weekly Standard 3 Comments
Reality Check: Al Qaeda Wasn’t ‘on the Run’
Stephen F. Hayes writes: In the early morning hours of May 2, 2011, an elite team of 25 American military and intelligence professionals landed inside the walls of a compound just outside the Pakistani city of Abbottabad. CIA analysts had painstakingly tracked a courier to the compound and spent months monitoring the activity inside the walls. They’d concluded, with varying levels of confidence, that the expansive white building at the center of the lot was the hideout of Osama bin Laden.
“Many of the analysts and military experts with access to the documents were struck by a glaring contradiction: As President Obama and his team campaigned on the coming demise of al Qaeda in the runup to the 2012 election, the documents told a very different story.”
They were correct. And minutes after the team landed, the search for bin Laden ended with a shot to his head.
The primary objective of Operation Neptune Spear was to capture or kill the leader of al Qaeda. But a handful of those on the ground that night were part of a “Sensitive Site Exploitation” team that had a secondary mission: to gather as much intelligence from the compound as they could.
“As the public heard this carefully managed story about al Qaeda, analysts at CENTCOM were poring over documents that showed something close to the opposite.”
With bin Laden dead and the building secure, they got to work. Moving quickly—as locals began to gather outside the compound and before the Pakistani military, which had not been notified of the raid in advance, could scramble its response—they shoved armload after armload of bin Laden’s belongings into large canvas bags. The entire operation took less than 40 minutes.
The intelligence trove was immense. At a Pentagon briefing one day after the raid, a senior official described the haul as a “robust collection of materials.” It included 10 hard drives, nearly 100 thumb drives, and a dozen cell phones—along with data cards, DVDs, audiotapes, magazines, newspapers, paper files.
In an interview on Meet the Press just days after the raid, Barack Obama’s national security adviser, Thomas Donilon, told David Gregory that the material could fill “a small college library.” A senior military intelligence official who briefed reporters at the Pentagon on May 7 said: “As a result of the raid, we’ve acquired the single largest collection of senior terrorist materials ever.”
In all, the U.S. government would have access to more than a million documents detailing al Qaeda’s funding, training, personnel, and future plans. The raid promised to be a turning point in America’s war on terror, not only because it eliminated al Qaeda’s leader, but also because the materials taken from his compound had great intelligence value. Analysts and policymakers would no longer need to depend on the inherently incomplete picture that had emerged from the piecing together of disparate threads of intelligence—collected via methods with varying records of success and from sources of uneven reliability. The bin Laden documents were primary source material, providing unmediated access to the thinking of al Qaeda leaders expressed in their own words.
A comprehensive and systematic examination of those documents could give U.S. intelligence officials—and eventually the American public—a better understanding of al Qaeda’s leadership, its affiliates, its recruitment efforts, its methods of communication; a better understanding, that is, of the enemy America has fought for over a decade now, at a cost of trillions of dollars and thousands of American lives.
Incredibly, such a comprehensive study—a thorough “document exploitation,” in the parlance of the intelligence community—never took place...(read more)
- Obama and John Brennan suppressing Key Evidence Acquired in Bin Laden Raid? (shoebat.com)
- Why Is The U.S. Government Ignoring The Documents And Intel Retrieved In The Bin Laden Raid? (warnewsupdates.blogspot.com)
- Al Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent incorporates regional jihadist groups (longwarjournal.org)
- Shabaab names new emir, reaffirms allegiance to al Qaeda (longwarjournal.org)
- ISIS grabs headlines, but Al Qaeda remains top threat to US, experts say (foxnews.com)
- Boko Haram’s Bin Laden Connection (thedailybeast.com)
- Obama’s ‘Blame It on The Video’ Was a Fraud for Cairo as Well as Benghazi – More Proof (punditfromanotherplanet.com)
- Report: Obama waited a month before ordering the James Foley rescue attempt (hotair.com)
- Is Snowden Helping ISIS? (powerlineblog.com)
- Bin Laden planned to attack the US on 10 year anniversary of 9/11 (dailycaller.com)
Reblogged this on SherayxWeblog.
The reason is simple…
The Two biggest threats the America faces are Global Climate Change and American Citizens.
We have no choice but to focus all of our efforts on the above.
President Obama personally killed Osama Bin Laden. What more do you want from him?
[…] [Also see – Stephen F. Hayes: Why Haven’t We Seen the Documents Retrieved in the Bin Laden Raid?] […]