David Harsanyi: The Future Should Belong To Those Who Can Slander the Prophet of Islam


 writes: On September 9, 2012, Egyptian demonstrators in Cairo scaled the walls of the U.S. Embassy and pulled down the American flag, threatening the lives of those inside to protest a film they claimed was insulting to the prophet Mohammad. Reacting to this attack on our sovereignty and the lives of our citizens, the administration acted in the most un-American way imaginable, sending out this preposterous message:

The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims — as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions.

The producer of this pointlessly inflammatory video was well within his rights to mock any religion he chose however he pleased. So the statement irresponsibly perpetuates a false notion about how free non-stop-panic-pearlsspeech works around here. Neither The Embassy of the United States in Cairo nor the president of United States has the power to apologize for your views on religion.

That’s the most obvious problem. But the gratuitous groveling we do to allay the sensitivities of violence-prone Muslims (because who else are we attempting to placate?) has become a cringe-worthy aspect of American policy long before Barack Obama ever showed up. When the Bush administration, in the middle of the Danish carton controversy, claimed that “Anti-Muslim images are as unacceptable as anti-Semitic images, as anti-Christian images or any other religious belief,” it was equally wrong. As far as the state goes, they’re all “acceptable.”

But only one of those can put you on kill lists.


After the deadly terrorist attack on the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris, France, it’s worth remembering that there is no amount of conciliating rhetoric that will stop attacks on our liberal values – even undermining them. Which is something we’ve done.

Surely you remember that the “Innocence of Muslim” fiasco didn’t end in Egypt. (Mollie talks about this more here.) U.S. taxpayers paid for television ads in Pakistan featuring footage of Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during press – subtitled in Urdu – condemning the video. “We absolutely reject its content and message,” Clinton explained. Bro-ster Tommy Vietor, then spokesman for the National Security Council, told theWashington Post that the White House has “reached out to YouTube to call the video to their attention and ask them to review whether it violates their terms of use.” And due to this pressure – what amounts to no less than de facto censorship – YouTube pulled the video. The man ended up in prison and the extremists won….(read more)

The Federalist

3 Comments on “David Harsanyi: The Future Should Belong To Those Who Can Slander the Prophet of Islam”

  1. Paul H. Lemmen says:

    Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.

  2. agent provocateur says:

    Reblogged this on Nevada State Personnel Watch.

  3. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    I agree 100%

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.