Henninger: ‘The Obama Doctrine is a Hoax’Posted: April 9, 2015
“It is a mistake to suggest U.S. foreign policy is weak only because Barack Obama is running it. On the cusp of a presidential election, the more pertinent question is whether U.S. foreign policy is weak because a Democrat is running it.”
“You asked about an Obama doctrine,” Mr. Obama said. “The doctrine is: We will engage, but we preserve all our capabilities.”
“You asked about an Obama doctrine. The doctrine is: We will engage, but we preserve all our capabilities.”
— President Obama
In nine words, Mr. Obama explained what has been going on the past six years, culminating in what we now see is the nucleus of the Obama worldview, an accommodation with Iran.
“This statement, and indeed the Obama Doctrine, is a hoax. Set aside that ‘messes with Israel’ and ‘America will be there’ are phrases with no real operational meaning.”
The corollary of the Obama Doctrine, as the president explained, is that if engagement with a hostile power turns dangerous, everyone in the world knows that U.S. “military superiority” will emerge and prevail. In case of emergency, Uncle Sam will break glass.
“What we will be doing even as we enter into this deal is sending a very clear message to the Iranians and to the entire region that if anybody messes with Israel, America will be there.”
— President Obama, bluffing.
Mr. Obama then offered an example of how this would work—U.S. support for Israel: “What we will be doing even as we enter into this deal is sending a very clear message to the Iranians and to the entire region that if anybody messes with Israel, America will be there.”
“To understand the bluff, look closely at the Democrats’ Doctrine on paper or in practice, and you’ll notice that it’s always prospective. It promises to act at some point in the future if circumstances become so dire that they oblige the U.S. to ‘overwhelm’ the problem with superior power. Never has there been a bigger ‘if.’”
This statement, and indeed the Obama Doctrine, is a hoax.
Set aside that “messes with Israel” and “America will be there” are phrases with no real operational meaning.
“Mr. Obama’s ‘doctrine’ is essentially that if something bad happens, he will send in the 82nd Airborne Division. But he won’t. No Democrat whose view of large-scale U.S. military power was formed by the Vietnam War or the Iraq War will do that.”
“America will be there” could mean that if someone set off a nuclear backpack bomb in Tel Aviv, where the Obama administration would be the next day is on New York’s east side, condemning the attack in a U.N. Security Council resolution.
“Other than aerial bombardments, using the full range of U.S. military assets ended for Democrats with the Johnson presidency.”
Any American foreign-policy doctrine needs interpretive wiggle room for the commander in chief. But anyone would assume that the phrase “America will be there” refers to the deployment of what Mr. Obama invokes as “our military superiority.”
Unless it doesn’t….(read more)
Write to firstname.lastname@example.org
- “Liberal” New York Times Provides Cover for Washington’s War Plans for Iran (peoplestrusttoronto.wordpress.com)
- Obama says a vulnerable Israel would be ‘failure’ of his presidency (alethonews.wordpress.com)
- Obama Sees ‘Chance for a Different Type of Relationship’ With Iran (patriotupdate.com)
- Obama: My Promise of Protection ‘Should be Sufficient’ for Israel (gunnygbb2.wordpress.com)
- Obama To Invite Netanyahu For Oval Office Meeting After Formation of New Gov’t: U.S. Ambassador (jpupdates.com)
- Reports: U.S. may no longer block anti-Israel U.N. actions (jta.org)
- The Crimes the New York Times Believes Should Go Unpunished (wakeupfromyourslumber.com)