Should the U.S. Keep Control of Group that Handles Internet Domain Names?
Posted: September 15, 2016 | Author: Pundit Planet | Filed under: Censorship, China, Global, Politics, Russia, Self Defense | Tags: Barack Obama, Chris Coons, Chuck Grassley, Domain name, Federal government of the United States, ICANN, Internet, Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Ted Cruz, United States, United States Department of Commerce, United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary |1 Comment‘Under the guardianship of the United States and the First Amendment the internet has become truly an oasis of freedom, but that could soon change.’
During an often-contentious hearing Wednesday, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, took on the Obama administration for what has become his latest signature issue: internet oversight.
“It is not a democratic body.”
— Senator Ted Cruz
The Obama administration is due to relinquish U.S. control Oct. 1 over a private-sector, nonprofit organization that administers internet domain names and designations. Cruz warned that the Internet Corp. for Assigned Names and Numbers will not on its own honor U.S. protections of free speech, and he is leading an effort to delay or stop the transfer.
“A number of significant questions related to the transition remain unanswered, including whether the transition will yield an unconstitutional transfer of United States government property, how the transfer will affect human rights and free speech issues, if U.S.-controlled top-level domains such as .gov and .mil could be compromised or if ICANN will be subject to increased antitrust scrutiny.”
“Under the guardianship of the United States and the First Amendment the internet has become truly an oasis of freedom, but that could soon change,” Cruz said at a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts, which he chairs.
“It is not a democratic body,” Cruz said of the organization, which includes such internet stakeholders as Google and Facebook and is based in Los Angeles. And he warned that authoritarian countries such as China, Russia and Iran could exert control over the organization and censor internet use in their countries.
[Read the full story here, at McClatchy DC]
We are a nonpolitical technical entity. Göran Marby, CEO and president, Internet Corp. for Assigned Names and Numbers
The Obama administration maintains that the transfer involves technical matters that do not affect the substance of websites or the flow of information. Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., the ranking member on the subcommittee, said the transition was really a “clerical process.” “The United States does not own the internet,” he said.
Cruz is poised to add an amendment to a temporary government funding bill to block the transfer – the same tactic he used in 2013 to stop funding the federal health care law, which led to a partial federal government shutdown. However, this time, Cruz has mainstream support from powerful Republicans.
[Read the full text here, at McClatchy DC]
Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, who is the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, attended the subcommittee hearing and was supportive of putting off the transfer.
“A number of significant questions related to the transition remain unanswered, including whether the transition will yield an unconstitutional transfer of United States government property, how the transfer will affect human rights and free speech issues, if U.S.-controlled top-level domains such as .gov and .mil could be compromised or if ICANN will be subject to increased antitrust scrutiny,” he said.
Goran Marby, the internet corporation’s CEO and president, told the committee, “We are a nonpolitical technical entity.”
The official in charge of the transition, Assistant Secretary of Commerce Lawrence Strickling, who heads the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, defended the transfer but at several points ended up in a shouting match with Cruz…(read more)
Source: McClatchy DC
Related articles
- Chilling photos show how atomic bomb tests in the Nevada desert brought LA to a standstill in the 1950s (plaintruth.com)
- Cruz Fights to Keep Internet in USA (teaparty.org)
- Cruz threatens shutdown over transferring internet domain naming to private body (seattletimes.com)
- This Is Deplorable: KY Gov. Matt Bevin Calls For ‘Bloodshed’ If Trump Loses | MadMikesAmerica (madmikesamerica.com)
- Federal appeals court finds ban on ‘issue ads’ unconstitutional (jurist.org)
- Obama’s Key Internet Giveaway Advocate Can’t Give a Straight Answer on Free Speech Concerns (joemiller.us)
- US Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing Held on IANA Transition (circleid.com)
- ‘High Noon’ Showdown Hearing In US Over Internet Control (ip-watch.org)
- United States Cedes Control of the Internet, Gawker Is Shutting Down… [Tech News Digest] (makeuseof.com)
Rate this:
Related
One Comment on “Should the U.S. Keep Control of Group that Handles Internet Domain Names?”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Reblogged this on and commented:
Congress is useless. When this happens, I expect my current blog to be shutdown. I have been on the deep web, looking for a place.