They Are All Pauline Kael NowPosted: November 17, 2016
The Pauline Kael Award Goes To… The Left
Charlotte Hays writes: The other day, when a friend who is old enough to have matured past her Bernie Sanders infatuation—but hasn’t—said to me with a mixture of awe and disdain that I was the only person she knew who voted for Trump, she put me in mind of the New York film critic Pauline Kael. “I can’t believe Nixon won,” Kael is famously supposed to have remarked of Richard Nixon’s landslide victory in 1972. “I don’t know anyone who voted for him.”
As likely the only out-of-the-closet Trump voter in my trendy Adams-Morgan neighborhood in Northwest Washington D.C., I feel it is my right and solemn duty to bestow upon some unsuspecting worthy the Pauline Kael Award for 2016. Only problem is, there aren’t enough Paulies to go around this year. The competition is fierce. But a few contenders stand out:
“If your social circles are like mine,” Brooks wrote, “You spent Tuesday night swapping miserable texts. Not all, but many of my friends and family members were outraged, stunned, disgusted and devastated. This is victory for white supremacy, people wrote, for misogyny, nativism and authoritarianism. Fascism is descending.”
Further demonstrating his gift for unintended humor, Mr. Brooks professed himself to be “humbled and taught by this horrific election result.” How humbled? In the column, Brooks goes on to humbly offer himself and like-minded thought leaders (his social circle?) as being graciously available to pick up the pieces when Trump resigns or is impeached, which Brooks humbly predicted would happen within a year, thus sending all those chastened Trump yahoos back into their hollows so that Brooks and his ilk can redesign American politics.
“The job for the rest of us,” Brooks argued without a trace of irony or self-awareness, “is to rebind the fabric of society, community by community, and to construct a political movement for the post-Trump era. I suspect the coming political movements will be identified on two axes: open and closed and individual and social.” Humble pie this is not.
Brooks, alas, will have to share his Paulie, if he is so fortunate as to win, with all his colleagues—the editorial and reporting staff—of the New York Times. The day before Mr. Brooks laid bare the inner workings of his social circle, the Times published an editorial that urged, “Denounce the Hate, Mr. Trump.” The editorial was occasioned by the riots that swept the nation in the wake of the election. The anti-Trump riots, that would be. Shouldn’t it be Mrs. Clinton or President Obama who is called upon to calm these anti-Trump troubled waters?
The Times editorial continued: “Explicit expressions of bigotry and hatred by Trump supporters were common throughout the campaign, and they have become even more intense since his election…(read more)
- Video: Just how much influence did Obama administration exert in Israel’s election? (hotair.com)
- Searching for Jeb Bush supporters in the belly of the “establishment” beast (powerlineblog.com)
- THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER: State Dept sand bags and slow-walks document requests by Republicans, but i… (pjmedia.com)
- Is It 1968 Again? Crime Rising “Unexpectedly” (powerlineblog.com)
- This letter proves the Nixons saw Trump’s victory coming (mashable.com)
- Whispers of a Hillary ‘Pardon’ Have Already Begun – And Obama’s White House Won’t Rule It Out… (ijr.com)