The Abortion Industry Has a New Enemy: Ultrasounds
Posted: January 24, 2017 | Author: Pundit Planet | Filed under: Health and Social Issues, Politics, Science & Technology, Think Tank | Tags: 3D modeling, 3D ultrasound, Abdominal pain, Abortion, Amygdala, CT scan, Magnetic resonance imaging, Mummy, Pro-Choice, Pro-Life, propaganda, Roe v. Wade |Leave a comment
“Weigel’s war on science, common sense, and life-saving medical technology is not aimless, though. Her real enemy is legislation that would criminalize abortion once an unborn baby’s heartbeat can be detected. Her logic is straightforward. If it’s illegal to kill a healthy, unborn baby after her heartbeat is detected, simply deny that she has a heartbeat.”
The article’s headline is bad enough—”How the Ultrasound Pushed the Idea That a Fetus Is a Person”—but its subhed is the real work of art: “The technology has been used to create an ‘imaginary’ heartbeat and sped-up videos that falsely depict a response to stimulus.”
[Read the full story here, at thefederalist.com]
There are numerous other gems throughout the piece, such as her implication that only male doctors are allowed to use ultrasounds.
.@TheAtlantic Retracts Claim That Fetal Heartbeats Are ‘Imaginary’ https://t.co/Z8kKqsYuiZ via @FBillMcMorris pic.twitter.com/2MQsOBvtxM
— Free Beacon (@FreeBeacon) January 24, 2017
“Ultrasound made it possible for the male doctor to evaluate the fetus without female interference,” Weigel declares. Are female doctors banned from or incapable of doing an ultrasound on a pregnant mother? What about X-rays, MRIs, or CT scans? Are those marvels of modern technology that have helped to diagnose and cure countless diseases and physical maladies since their inception? Or are they evil technologies that merely enable peeping mandoctors to cast their eyes into the inner recesses of a woman’s body?
Weigel’s war on science, common sense, and life-saving medical technology is not aimless, though. Her real enemy is legislation that would criminalize abortion once an unborn baby’s heartbeat can be detected. Her logic is straightforward. If it’s illegal to kill a healthy, unborn baby after her heartbeat is detected, simply deny that she has a heartbeat…(read more)
Source: thefederalist.com