[VIDEO] Democrat FEC Member Quitting Sets Up Political FightPosted: February 20, 2017 Filed under: Breaking News, Mediasphere, Politics | Tags: Ann Ravel, Barack Obama, Bernie Sanders, Democratic Party (United States), Democratic Party presidential primaries, Donald Trump, FEC, Federal Election Commission, Hillary Clinton, Jeremy Carl, National Review, Republican Party (United States), video Leave a comment
Strategy Room: Sarah Badawi and Brian Morgenstern on how President Trump will handle open spot on commission.
Real FEC reform would be the opposite of what Ann Ravel and her Democratic colleagues want.
Jeremy Carl writes: When Ann Ravel, a Democratic member of the Federal Election Commission (FEC), announced her intention to resign Sunday, she received, as she has throughout her tenure at the FEC, a surprising amount of news coverage. While her departure may not immediately change the partisan balance of the commission, because traditionally her seat “belongs” to the Democrats, President Trump could upset that calculation if he broke with that tradition and appointed someone more aligned with the GOP (though he is not allowed to pick a registered Republican for the seat).
Ravel had become a minor political celebrity (even earning a Daily Show appearance) on the left by castigating the “deadlock” on the FEC allegedly caused by the GOP members, who wouldn’t go along with Democratic demands for campaign-finance fines.
Ravel’s resignation letter is filled with the same sort of tired Democratic rhetoric on campaign finance, demanding the overturning of Citizens United, pushing for expanded public (i.e., taxpayer) financing of political campaigns, and decrying the evils of “dark money.”
[Read the full story here, at National Review]
Yet President Trump showed the complete intellectual bankruptcy of the campaign-finance “reform” movement in his stunning presidential-election victory. According to the FEC’s own data, among large donors ($2,000+), Hillary Clinton out-raised Trump $175 million to $27 million, a ratio of 6.5 to 1. Despite this, and the almost unanimous support she enjoyed from our media and cultural elites, Clinton couldn’t defeat Trump. Furthermore, Bernie Sanders, an eccentric and aging socialist with no establishment backing, came close to beating Hillary in the Democratic primary despite being outspent among those same $2,000+ donors by a ratio of more than 50 to 1.
Meanwhile, in one of the most remarkable yet least reported facts about the 2016 campaign, Jeb Bush, who entered the race to a wave of publicity before going out with a whimper early in the GOP primary, raised essentially as much ($26 million) in his brief campaign from those $2,000+ donors as Trump did from this group during the entire primary and general-election cycle.
The 2016 election was, for anyone who had eyes to see it, the most dramatic repudiation possible of the false notion that big donors determine the fate of our candidates or our politics. Given such facts, Ravel’s cri de coeur
Real FEC reform would be the opposite of what Ravel and her Democratic colleagues want. We don’t need to increase disclosure — we need to reduce it. Or, to put it more accurately, we need to give normal political donors back their privacy … (read more)
Source: National Review
- Hillary Clinton was among the ‘least surprised’ that Trump won the election (businessinsider.com)
- Bernie Sanders Will Give the Commencement Speech at Brooklyn College (time.com)
- Bernie Sanders to speak at Kansas Democratic Party annual convention (ksn.com)
- Stodden wants to date girls (foxnews.com)
- Gloria Steinem Throws Her Support Behind Keith Ellison for DNC Chair (nymag.com)
- I bet you thought the Democratic primary fight was over (hotair.com)
- Trump’s New Foreign-Policy Direction (feedproxy.google.com)
- Open thread: Sunday morning talking heads (hotair.com)
- The Bush Dilemma: Too Much Supply, Not Enough Demand (punditfromanotherplanet.com)
- Jindal: Sanders And Clinton Will Turn US Into Greece (dailycaller.com)