Kimberley A. Strassel: No Political GuardrailsPosted: December 11, 2015 | Author: Pundit Planet | Filed under: Crime & Corruption, Global, History, Politics, Think Tank, White House | Tags: Authoritarian, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Divisive, Donald Trump, Ethics, Executive Branch, Fascist, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush, Kimberley A. Strassel, National security, Populist, President of the United States | Leave a comment
President Obama broke all the boundaries—and now Clinton and Trump are following suit.
Kimberley A. Strassel writes: Twenty-two years ago, my esteemed colleague Dan Henninger wrote a blockbuster Journal editorial titled “No Guardrails.” Its subject was people “who don’t think that rules of personal or civil conduct apply to them,” as well as the elites who excuse this lack of self-control and the birth of a less-civilized culture.
“Can such leaders be trusted to administer Washington fairly? Of course not. That guardrail is also gone. Mr. Obama egged on his IRS to target conservatives, used his Justice Department to exact retribution on politically unpopular banks, and had his EPA lead an armed raid of an Alaskan mine.”
We are today witnessing the political version of this phenomenon. That’s how to make sense of a presidential race that grows more disconnected from normality by the day.
“Mr. Obama doesn’t need anyone to justify his actions, because he’s realized no one can stop him. He gets criticized, but at the same time his approach has seeped into the national conscience. It has set new norms.”
Barack Obama has done plenty of damage to the country, but perhaps the worst is his determined destruction of Washington’s guardrails. Mr. Obama wants what he wants. If ObamaCare is problematic, he unilaterally alters the law.
[Read the full text of Kimberley A. Strassel’s article here, at WSJ]
If Congress won’t change the immigration system, he refuses to enforce it. If the nation won’t support laws to fight climate change, he creates one with regulation. If the Senate won’t confirm his nominees, he declares it in recess and installs them anyway. “As to limits, you set your own,” observed Dan in that editorial. This is our president’s motto.
“Mrs. Clinton routinely vows to govern by diktat. On Wednesday she unveiled a raft of proposals to punish companies that flee the punitive U.S. tax system. Mrs. Clinton will ask Congress to implement her plan, but no matter if it doesn’t. ‘If Congress won’t act,’ she promises, ‘then I will ask the Treasury Department, when I’m there, to use its regulatory authority.’”
Mr. Obama doesn’t need anyone to justify his actions, because he’s realized no one can stop him. He gets criticized, but at the same time his approach has seeped into the national conscience. It has set new norms. You see this in the ever-more-outrageous proposals from the presidential field, in particular front-runners Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
“Today’s divisive president never misses an opportunity to deride Republicans or the tea party. He is more scornful toward fellow Americans than toward Islamic State. This too sets new norms.”
Mrs. Clinton routinely vows to govern by diktat. On Wednesday she unveiled a raft of proposals to punish companies that flee the punitive U.S. tax system. Mrs. Clinton will ask Congress to implement her plan, but no matter if it doesn’t. “If Congress won’t act,” she promises, “then I will ask the Treasury Department, when I’m there, to use its regulatory authority.”
“Think what you may about George W. Bush’s policies, but he respected the office of the presidency. He believed he represented all Americans. He didn’t demonize.”
[Read the full text here, at WSJ]
Mrs. Clinton and fellow liberals don’t like guns and are frustrated that the duly elected members of Congress (including those from their own party) won’t strengthen background checks. So she has promised to write regulations that will unilaterally impose such a system.
“For his part, Mr. Trump sent the nation into an uproar this week with his call to outright ban Muslims from entering the country. Is this legally or morally sound? Who cares! Mr. Trump specializes in disdain for the law, the Constitution, and any code of civilized conduct. Guardrails are for losers.”
On immigration, Mr. Obama ignored statute with executive actions to shield illegals from deportation. Mrs. Clinton brags that she will go much, much further with sweeping exemptions to immigration law. Read the rest of this entry »
[REWIND] Obama in 2010: Don’t Compare Your Political Opponents to Authoritarian, Murderous RegimesPosted: August 7, 2015 | Author: Pundit Planet | Filed under: Crime & Corruption, Mediasphere, Politics, White House | Tags: Authoritarian, Barack Obama, Civility, Debate, Demagogue, Iran Deal, Left Wing, media, Motives, Murderous Regime, news, POTUS, propaganda, Right Wing, Socialism, Twitter | 1 Comment
Matt Wolking via Twitter
Peter Moruzzi: Havana Before Castro, When Cuba was a Tropical PlaygroundPosted: August 3, 2015 | Author: Pundit Planet | Filed under: Art & Culture, Entertainment, History | Tags: Advertising, Authoritarian, Capitalism, Communism, Cuba, Dictatorship, Fidel Castro, Free market, Glamour, Havana, Hotels, Police state, Poverty, Resorts, Totalitarian, travel, Tropical, Tyranny, vintage | 1 Comment
Vintage ‘Progressivism Today’ MagazinePosted: July 20, 2015 | Author: Pundit Planet | Filed under: Art & Culture, Comics, Entertainment, Humor | Tags: Authoritarian, Comics, Magazines, Nazism, Progressivism, pulp fiction, satire, Sin, Slavery, Socialism, swastika, Thriller, Torture, Totalitarianism, vintage, Whip | Leave a comment