The New York Times, Charles C.W. Cooke, and Nicholas Johnson: The Black Tradition of Arms and Historical Illiteracy
Posted: October 26, 2014 Filed under: Law & Justice, Mediasphere, Self Defense, Think Tank | Tags: Charles C. W. Cooke, Danny Glover, Fordham University School of Law, Gun rights, Gun: The Black Tradition of Arms, Hollywood, Nicholas Johnson, Second Amendment, Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, Texas A&M University 2 CommentsThis line is popular among the historically illiterate. Nicholas Johnson on why it’s nonsense: http://t.co/uSvRTbPSm4pic.twitter.com/gyfXsk4pLe
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) October 27, 2014
Nicholas J. Johnson is Professor of Law, Fordham University School of Law is the author of Negroes and the Gun: The Black Tradition of Arms. He is the lead editor of Firearms Law and the Second Amendment: Cases and Materials (Aspen Press, 2012).
For the Online Library of Law & Liberty, Nicholas J. Johnson writes:
In a January 17 speech to students at Texas A&M University, Danny Glover, the actor from Lethal Weapon etc., attempted to disparage the constitutional right to arms with the critique that “The Second Amendment comes from the right to protect themselves from slave revolts, and from uprisings by Native Americans.”
This is abundantly wrong and I hope the students will not consider Mr. Glover a definitive source on the question. But I will give him credit for the try. He attempted to engage the issue by at least skimming one piece of the voluminous scholarship in this area.
His comment seems based on a cursory reading of a 1998 law review article by Professor Carl Bogus. First, it warms the academic’s heart that a Hollywood actor would sit down and read a law review article, although I acknowledge the possibility that someone just told him about it.
[Check out Nicholas Johnson’s book “Negroes and the Gun: The Black Tradition of Arms” at Amazon]
Also see – [VIDEO] How the Civil Rights Movement Changed Black Gun Culture
Either way, his education is incomplete (as is true for all of us). Mr. Glover’s mistake is to have taken one dubious thing and run with it. That is almost always a mistake and especially so in the gun debate. But Danny Glover’s mistake is also a teaching tool that illuminates the broader conversation. Read the rest of this entry »