BLACKOUT: Planned Parenthood Organ Trafficking Media Silence: ‘I’m Going Dark’

going-dark

Okay, to be fair, The Hill did cover it today. Sort of.

theHill-twitterpundit-planet-hill-headline-twitter

M.Z.Hemingway writes

…While the media usually rush to flood the zone on news stories — for a few weeks our media were obsessed with stories surrounding the Confederate flag, for instance — there has been a stunning blackout on this news story. Six hours after the news broke, here is how major media reported on the expose of Planned Parenthood:

Washington Post:

Screen-Shot-2015-07-14-at-1.33.30-PM

New York Times:

Screen-Shot-2015-07-14-at-1.34.47-PM

CNN:

Screen-Shot-2015-07-14-at-1.35.39-PM

Los Angeles Times:

Screen-Shot-2015-07-14-at-1.36.47-PM

Politico:

Screen-Shot-2015-07-14-at-1.37.52-PM

ABC News:

Screen-Shot-2015-07-14-at-1.38.47-PM

NBC News:

Screen-Shot-2015-07-14-at-1.39.38-PM Read the rest of this entry »


National Review Cover: Kevin D. Williamson on ‘The Colorado Pot Experiment’

NR-cover-July-2015

[Read it here at National Review Online]

 


CLINTON EMAILS RELEASED: ‘As You Can See, the First Batch is Full of Bombshells’

bombshell!

Via Ian Tuttle, The Corner 


Sacré Bleu! French Blogger Fined for Bitching Online About Restaurant Food & Service

Critique de Restaurant: Blogueuse Condamnée
'The Place to be Avoided at Cap-Ferret'

What is perverse, is that we look for bloggers who are influential, but only if they are nice about people.”

— Caroline Doudet, Blogger

For arretsurimages.netVincent Coquaz reports:

— Translated from French via Google Translate —

“New: restaurants continue their customers who dare to criticize I must say they are the judges to prove them right.”. The lawyer-blogger Maître Eolas was surprised last night of the decision of the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Bordeaux on June 30, which condemned referred blogger “The Irregular” € 1500 as a provision on damages 1000 € of costs of proceedings (Article 700 of the Code of Civil Procedure) for a review of a restaurant in Cap Ferret (33).

[A better analysis of this at The Corner by National Review‘s Ian Tuttle  – “French Court Criminalizes Food Critic’s Google Success”]

This restaurant had just enjoyed a post “The Irregular” titled “The place to be avoided at Cap-Ferret” followed by the name of the institution (the article has since been removed but is still available in the cache here) published in August 2013, and appeared on the first page of Google when you typed the name of the restaurant.

[Also see – “French blogger fined over review’s Google search placing” BBC News]

‘The Place to be Avoided at Cap-Ferret’ 

The paper lamented including disruption of service in the institution and the attitude of the owner of the premises, described as a “diva”. “All that for two appetizers … take what wars” concluded the post with reference to a dark history of appetizers arrived at the same time as the main course (the blogger had therefore returned). Read the rest of this entry »