79 Days That Shook Hong Kong
Posted: December 15, 2014 Filed under: China, Global, Mediasphere, Politics | Tags: Hong Kong, Pro-Democracy Movement, protests, Umbrella Revolution, Universal suffrage 5 CommentsHong Kong’s Final Protest Site Has Been Cleared
Posted: December 15, 2014 Filed under: Asia, Breaking News, China, Global, Mediasphere, Politics | Tags: Hong Kong, Pro-Democracy Movement, Protest, Umbrella Revolution, Universal suffrage 1 CommentHong Kong has too many poor people to allow direct elections, leader says
Posted: October 20, 2014 Filed under: Asia, China, Global, Law & Justice, Mediasphere, Politics | Tags: Election, Hong Kong, Mong Kok, Pro-Democracy, protests, Umbrella Revolution, Universal suffrage 1 Comment[PHOTO] Kin Cheung: Walking through Tunnels on Barricaded Road in Hong Kong
Posted: October 12, 2014 Filed under: Asia, China, Mediasphere | Tags: Beijing, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Federation of Students, Hong Kong government, Mong Kok, Occupy Central, Pan-democracy camp, Photography, Pro-Democracy, Twitter, Universal suffrage 1 CommentWalking thru tunnels on barricaded road Hong Kong, great shot of it by Kin Cheung in @in_focus http://t.co/2S8IUNEgpl pic.twitter.com/DHHEw4SvMo
— Alex Ogle (@Alex_Ogle) October 11, 2014
Umbrella Up, Hong Kong Makes TIME
Posted: October 1, 2014 Filed under: Asia, China, Global | Tags: Freedom, Hong Kong, media, Time, Umbrella Revolution, Universal suffrage 1 CommentStreaming Video of the Occupy Central Protests in Hong Kong
Posted: September 28, 2014 Filed under: Asia, Breaking News, China, Global | Tags: Beijing, China, Government of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Occupy Central, Protest, Universal suffrage, Wall Street Journal 1 CommentOn Sept. 28, organizers of Occupy Central, a civil disobedience movement pushing for universal suffrage in Hong Kong, joined student protesters in calling for democracy in the city. Occupy Central decided to launch its protests early after student protesters attempted to break into the Hong Kong government headquarters, sparking clashes with police.
The Wall Street Journal is now streaming video from the site of the protests here with periodic live updates when local Internet bandwidth permits… (more)
Tocqueville on the 47 Percent
Posted: September 26, 2012 Filed under: Economics | Tags: Alexis de Tocqueville, Poverty, Romney, Tax, Tocqueville, United States, Universal suffrage, Wealth Leave a commentNoting Romney’s “inelegant” comments about the 47% who don’t pay taxes, Powerline turns to the always elegant Alexis de Tocqueville, quoting from his chapter in Book 1:
CHARGES LEVIED BY THE STATE UNDER THE RULE OF THE AMERICAN DEMOCRACY:
Let us now suppose that the legislative authority is vested in the lowest order: there are two striking reasons which show that the tendency of the expenditures will be to increase, not to diminish.
As the great majority of those who create the laws have no taxable property, all the money that is spent for the community appears to be spent to their advantage, at no cost of their own, and those who have some little property readily find means of so regulating the taxes that they weigh upon the wealthy and profit the poor, although the rich cannot take the same advantage when they are in possession of the government.
In countries in which the poor have the exclusive power of making the laws, no great economy of public expenditure ought to be expected; that expenditure will always be considerable either because the taxes cannot weigh upon those who levy them or because they are levied in such a manner as not to reach these poorer classes. In other words, the government of the democracy is the only one under which the power that votes the taxes escapes the payment of them.
In vain will it be objected that the true interest of the people is to spare the fortunes of the rich, since they must suffer in the long run from the general impoverishment which will ensue. . .
Here we should observe that Tocqueville inclines toward supply-side economics. To continue:
Again, it may be objected that the poor never have the sole power of making the laws; but I reply that wherever universal suffrage has been established, the majority unquestionably exercises the legislative authority; and if it be proved that the poor always constitute the majority, may it not be added with perfect truth that in the countries in which they possess the elective franchise they possess the sole power of making the laws? It is certain that in all the nations of the world the greater number has always consisted of those persons who hold no property, or of those whose property is insufficient to exempt them from the necessity of working in order to procure a comfortable subsistence. Universal suffrage, therefore, in point of fact does invest the poor with the government of society.
The disastrous influence that popular authority may sometimes exercise upon the finances of a state was clearly seen in some of the democratic republics of antiquity, in which the public treasure was exhausted in order to relieve indigent citizens or to supply games and theatrical amusements for the populace. It is true that the representative system was then almost unknown, and that at the present time the influence of popular passions is less felt in the conduct of public affairs; but it may well be believed that in the end the delegate will conform to the principles of his constituents and favor their propensities as much as their interests.
But then Tocqueville provides the remedy that is missing from Romney’s rhetoric—how opportunity and social mobility, rather than redistribution, is the better road to advancement:
The extravagance of democracy is less to be dreaded, however, in proportion as the people acquire a share of property, because, on the one hand, the contributions of the rich are then less needed, and, on the other, it is more difficult to impose taxes that will not reach the imposers.
via Tocqueville on the 47 Percent | Power Line